Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Cambodia

Cambodia: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
3 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 191 countries
All-time high
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2008
All-time low
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Cambodia, 2003–2019

01232003201120192003: 0 DB15-20 methodology2004: 0 DB15-20 methodology2005: 0 DB15-20 methodology2006: 0 DB15-20 methodology2007: 0 DB15-20 methodology2008: 3 DB15-20 methodology2009: 3 DB15-20 methodology2010: 3 DB15-20 methodology2011: 3 DB15-20 methodology2012: 3 DB15-20 methodology2013: 3 DB15-20 methodology2014: 3 DB15-20 methodology2015: 3 DB15-20 methodology2016: 3 DB15-20 methodology2017: 3 DB15-20 methodology2018: 3 DB15-20 methodology2019: 3 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Cambodia is 3 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Cambodia peaked at 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Cambodia 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Cambodia, year by year

Annual values for Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology) in Cambodia, 2003 to 2019.
Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2004 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2005 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2006 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2007 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2008 3 DB15-20 methodology —
2009 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2010 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2014 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2015 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Cambodia compared with similar countries

  • Cambodia's 3 DB15-20 methodology is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.5 DB15-20 methodology, 6.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.8571 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Cambodia

  1. 1 United States 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 1 Japan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 1 Albania 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 1 Croatia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 1 Czechia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 1 Germany 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 1 Italy 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 1 Kenya 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 1 South Korea 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 1 Kosovo 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 1 Micronesia (country) 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 1 Montenegro 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 1 North Macedonia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 1 Philippines 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 1 Poland 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 1 Portugal 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 1 Puerto Rico 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 1 Rwanda 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 1 Serbia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 1 Slovakia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 1 Thailand 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Cambodia

All data for Cambodia →

Frequently asked questions

What is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Cambodia?
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Cambodia was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Cambodia?
The highest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2008.
What is the lowest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Cambodia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Cambodia rank for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
Cambodia ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) rising or falling in Cambodia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Cambodia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Cambodia. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/cambodia/">Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Cambodia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.