Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Togo
Togo: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) was 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Togo, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Togo is 0.5 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Togo peaked at 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.5 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Togo ranks 89th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Togo, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Togo compared with similar countries
- Togo's 0.5 DB15-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.5 DB15-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Togo
- 89 Indonesia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Australia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Belarus 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Benin 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Burkina Faso 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Cameroon 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Central African Republic 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Chad 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Colombia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Comoros 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Congo 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Cote d'Ivoire 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Dominican Republic 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Equatorial Guinea 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Gabon 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Guinea 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Guinea-Bissau 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Hungary 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Jordan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Laos 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Liberia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Lithuania 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Luxembourg 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Madagascar 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Malawi 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Malaysia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Mali 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Mauritius 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Mongolia 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 New Zealand 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Niger 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Panama 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Peru 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Senegal 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Seychelles 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Singapore 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 South Africa 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 South Sudan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Sri Lanka 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Taiwan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Tajikistan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Uganda 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Ukraine 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Uzbekistan 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 89 Zimbabwe 0.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Togo
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2131 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9469 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1011 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7145 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8422 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5505 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Togo?
- Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Togo was 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Togo?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- What is the lowest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Togo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Togo rank for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
- Togo ranks 89th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) rising or falling in Togo?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Togo data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.