Statizoid

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Czechia

Czechia: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
3 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Czechia, 2003–2019

01232003201120192003: 3 DB15-20 methodology2004: 3 DB15-20 methodology2005: 3 DB15-20 methodology2006: 3 DB15-20 methodology2007: 3 DB15-20 methodology2008: 3 DB15-20 methodology2009: 3 DB15-20 methodology2010: 3 DB15-20 methodology2011: 3 DB15-20 methodology2012: 3 DB15-20 methodology2013: 3 DB15-20 methodology2014: 3 DB15-20 methodology2015: 3 DB15-20 methodology2016: 3 DB15-20 methodology2017: 3 DB15-20 methodology2018: 3 DB15-20 methodology2019: 3 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Czechia stood at 3 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Czechia peaked at 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 3 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

Czechia ranks 1st of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Czechia

  1. 1 United States 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 1 Japan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 1 Albania 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 1 Cambodia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 1 Croatia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 1 Germany 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 1 Italy 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 1 Kenya 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 1 South Korea 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 1 Micronesia (country) 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 1 Montenegro 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 1 North Macedonia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 1 Philippines 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 1 Poland 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 1 Portugal 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 1 Puerto Rico 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 1 Rwanda 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 1 Serbia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 1 Slovakia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 1 Thailand 3 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Czechia

All data for Czechia →

Frequently asked questions

What is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Czechia?
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Czechia was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Czechia?
The highest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Czechia?
The lowest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Czechia rank for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
Czechia ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) rising or falling in Czechia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Czechia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.