Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
3 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 191 countries
All-time high
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2003–2019

01232003201120192003: 3 DB15-20 methodology2004: 3 DB15-20 methodology2005: 3 DB15-20 methodology2006: 3 DB15-20 methodology2007: 3 DB15-20 methodology2008: 3 DB15-20 methodology2009: 3 DB15-20 methodology2010: 3 DB15-20 methodology2011: 3 DB15-20 methodology2012: 3 DB15-20 methodology2013: 3 DB15-20 methodology2014: 3 DB15-20 methodology2015: 3 DB15-20 methodology2016: 3 DB15-20 methodology2017: 3 DB15-20 methodology2018: 3 DB15-20 methodology2019: 3 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

Bosnia and Herzegovina recorded 3 DB15-20 methodology for reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 3 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Bosnia and Herzegovina 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year

Annual values for Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2003 to 2019.
Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 3 DB15-20 methodology
2004 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2005 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2006 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2007 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2008 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2009 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2010 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2014 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2015 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina

  1. 1 United States of America 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 1 Japan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 1 Albania 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 1 Cambodia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 1 Croatia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 1 Czechia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 1 Germany 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 1 Italy 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 1 Kenya 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 1 Republic of Korea 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 1 Kosovo 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 1 Micronesia, Federated States of 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 1 Montenegro 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 1 North Macedonia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 1 Philippines 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 1 Poland 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 1 Portugal 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 1 Puerto Rico 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 1 Rwanda 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 1 Serbia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 1 Slovakia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 1 Thailand 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Bosnia and Herzegovina

All data for Bosnia and Herzegovina →

Frequently asked questions

What is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The highest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest reorganization proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The lowest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is reorganization proceedings index (0-3) rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) in Bosnia and Herzegovina</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.