Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Equatorial Guinea
-1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Zimbabwe
-1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
191st
Zimbabwe rank
188th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
-2.2-2-1.8-1.5-1.2199620102025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 191st and Zimbabwe ranks 188th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -1.75 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Zimbabwe
2000s -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.98 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Equatorial Guinea
2010s -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0282 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Equatorial Guinea
2020s -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Equatorial Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 191st and Zimbabwe ranks 188th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/zimbabwe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.