Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Myanmar
Myanmar: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Myanmar, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Myanmar stood at -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is down 27.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Myanmar peaked at -0.7446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2020 and was at its lowest, -2.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
Myanmar ranks 193rd of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Myanmar, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.87 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.93 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2000 | -2.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.1% |
| 2002 | -2.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.7% |
| 2003 | -2.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2004 | -2.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.7% |
| 2005 | -2.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.5% |
| 2006 | -2.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.7% |
| 2007 | -2.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | -2.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2010 | -1.68 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -21.6% |
| 2011 | -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.2% |
| 2012 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.6% |
| 2013 | -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.1% |
| 2014 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.1% |
| 2015 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.1% |
| 2016 | -0.9048 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.5% |
| 2017 | -0.8668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.2% |
| 2018 | -0.8453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.5% |
| 2019 | -0.8772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.8% |
| 2020 | -0.7446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.1% |
| 2021 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +54.0% |
| 2022 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.4% |
| 2023 | -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.8% |
| 2024 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2025 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
Myanmar compared with similar countries
- Myanmar's -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6455 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 2.3× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Myanmar's -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is -0.0624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 23.3× the median. (34 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.9 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.93 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.87 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -2.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Myanmar
- 190 Democratic Republic of Congo -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 191 Equatorial Guinea -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 192 Afghanistan -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 194 Yemen -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 195 Haiti -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 196 Iran -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Myanmar
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 11.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 19.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 73.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 13.8 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Myanmar?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Myanmar was -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Myanmar?
- The highest recorded value was -0.7446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2020.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Myanmar?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Myanmar rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Myanmar ranks 193rd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Myanmar?
- Over the last ten years it is down 27.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Myanmar data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.