Belarus vs Russian Federation: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Belarus
60
in 2019
Russian Federation
60
in 2019
Belarus rank
94th
Russian Federation rank
94th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Belarus
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 60 against 60 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Belarus ranks 94th and Russian Federation ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34 | 60 | 26 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 67 | 60 | 7 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Belarus or Russian Federation?
- Belarus, at 60 against 60 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Belarus and Russian Federation?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Russian Federation?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Russian Federation rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Belarus ranks 94th and Russian Federation ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.