Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Peru

Peru: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 70 in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
70
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
16th
of 191 countries
All-time high
70
in 2012
All-time low
56.67
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Peru, 2005–2013

0204060802005200920132005: 56.72006: 602007: 602008: 602009: 602010: 602011: 63.32012: 702013: 70

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Peru recorded 70 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

That represents a change of up 23.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Peru peaked at 70 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 56.67, in 2005.

That places Peru 16th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Peru, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Peru, 2005 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2005 56.67 —
2006 60 +5.9%
2007 60 +0.0%
2008 60 +0.0%
2009 60 +0.0%
2010 60 +0.0%
2011 63.33 +5.6%
2012 70 +10.5%
2013 70 +0.0%

Peru compared with similar countries

  • Peru's 70 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 53.33, 1.3× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Peru's 70 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 53.33, 1.3× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 59.33 56.67 60 5
2010s 65.83 60 70 4

Countries ranked near Peru

  1. 14 Georgia 73.33 compare
  2. 14 Slovenia 73.33 compare
  3. 16 Bangladesh 70 compare
  4. 16 Japan 70 compare
  5. 16 Albania 70 compare
  6. 16 Belgium 70 compare
  7. 16 Mongolia 70 compare
  8. 16 Puerto Rico 70 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Peru

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Peru?
Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Peru was 70 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Peru?
The highest recorded value was 70 in 2012.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Peru?
The lowest recorded value was 56.67 in 2005.
How does Peru rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Peru ranks 16th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Peru?
Over the last ten years it is up 23.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Peru data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Peru. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/peru/">Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Peru</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.