How does Puerto Rico rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?

Puerto Rico ranks 16th out of 188 countries with data for 2013.

Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Puerto Rico?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Puerto Rico

Name: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Puerto Rico
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Puerto Rico: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 70 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

16th

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2005

All-time low

in 2005

Years of data

2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Puerto Rico, 2005–2013

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Puerto Rico stood at 70. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Puerto Rico peaked at 70 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 70, in 2005.

That places Puerto Rico 16th out of 188 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	70	70	70	5
2010s	70	70	70	4

Countries ranked near Puerto Rico

14 Georgia 73.33 compare
14 Slovenia 73.33 compare
16 Bangladesh 70 compare
16 Japan 70 compare
16 Albania 70 compare
16 Belgium 70 compare
16 Mongolia 70 compare
16 Peru 70 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Puerto Rico

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0791 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1862 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 326.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.983 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0392 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2501 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 36.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.7966 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 1.24 (2050)

All data for Puerto Rico →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Puerto Rico?: Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Puerto Rico was 70 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Puerto Rico?: The highest recorded value was 70 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Puerto Rico?: The lowest recorded value was 70 in 2005.
How does Puerto Rico rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?: Puerto Rico ranks 16th out of 188 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Puerto Rico?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Puerto Rico data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.