Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Japan

Japan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 70 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
70
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
16th
of 191 countries
All-time high
70
in 2005
All-time low
70
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Japan, 2005–2013

0204060802005200920132005: 702006: 702007: 702008: 702009: 702010: 702011: 702012: 702013: 70

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Japan recorded 70 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Japan peaked at 70 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 70, in 2005.

That places Japan 16th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Japan, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Japan, 2005 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2005 70 —
2006 70 +0.0%
2007 70 +0.0%
2008 70 +0.0%
2009 70 +0.0%
2010 70 +0.0%
2011 70 +0.0%
2012 70 +0.0%
2013 70 +0.0%

Japan compared with similar countries

  • Japan's 70 is above the median for high income countries, which is 56.67, 1.2× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Japan's 70 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 58.33, 1.2× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 70 70 70 5
2010s 70 70 70 4

Countries ranked near Japan

  1. 14 Georgia 73.33 compare
  2. 14 Slovenia 73.33 compare
  3. 16 Bangladesh 70 compare
  4. 16 Albania 70 compare
  5. 16 Belgium 70 compare
  6. 16 Mongolia 70 compare
  7. 16 Peru 70 compare
  8. 16 Puerto Rico 70 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Japan

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Japan?
Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Japan was 70 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Japan?
The highest recorded value was 70 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Japan?
The lowest recorded value was 70 in 2005.
How does Japan rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Japan ranks 16th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Japan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Japan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Japan. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/japan/">Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Japan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.