Japan vs Peru: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Japan
70
in 2013
Peru
70
in 2013
Japan rank
16th
Peru rank
16th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Peru
How they compare
Japan currently reports 70 against 70 in Peru, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 188 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 59.33 | 10.67 | Japan |
| 2010s | 70 | 65.83 | 4.17 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Japan or Peru?
- Japan, at 70 against 70 in Peru as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Japan and Peru?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Peru?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Japan and Peru rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.