Japan vs Puerto Rico: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Japan
70
in 2013
Puerto Rico
70
in 2013
Japan rank
16th
Puerto Rico rank
16th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Japan currently reports 70 against 70 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 16th and Puerto Rico ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Japan or Puerto Rico?
- Japan, at 70 against 70 in Puerto Rico as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Japan and Puerto Rico?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Puerto Rico?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Japan and Puerto Rico rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 16th and Puerto Rico ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.