Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Korea: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Azerbaijan, Republic of
66.67
in 2013
Korea
66.67
in 2013
Azerbaijan, Republic of rank
23rd
Korea rank
23rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan, Republic of
- Korea
How they compare
Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Korea ahead.
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 23rd and Korea ranks 23rd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan, Republic of | Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.67 | 60 | 7.33 | Korea |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 63.33 | 3.33 | Azerbaijan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Korea?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Korea as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Korea?
- 0, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Korea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Korea rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 23rd and Korea ranks 23rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.