PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4 by country

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 545 but lower than or equal to 607 on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 4, students can work effectively with explicit models for complex concrete situations that may involve constraints or call for making assumptions. They can select and integrate different...

Countries reporting
51
Highest
30.3%
Macao
Lowest
1.8%
Tunisia
Median
18.2%
Years covered
16
2003–2018
Data points
303

What the numbers show

PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4 is currently reported for 51 countries. The highest value is 30.3% in Macao; the lowest is 1.8% in Tunisia.

The median across all reporting countries is 18.2%, and the mean is 15.9%.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 17.

Over the past decade 34 countries rose and 17 fell. The largest increase was in Indonesia (up 148.0%), and the largest decrease in Argentina (down 42.5%).

PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Macao 30.3% 2018 up 23.4% rising
3 Japan 25.1% 2018 up 6.7% rising
4 Estonia 24.6% 2018 up 8.4% rising
5 Netherlands 23.6% 2018 down 1.4% flat
6 Denmark 23.0% 2018 up 9.7% flat
7 South Korea 22.9% 2018 down 12.8% falling
8 Finland 22.7% 2018 down 18.5% falling
9 Poland 22.3% 2018 up 17.4% rising
10 Switzerland 22.3% 2018 down 5.1% flat
11 Belgium 22.2% 2018 up 4.3% flat
12 Slovenia 22.0% 2018 up 15.4% rising
13 Canada 21.7% 2018 down 13.0% falling
14 France 21.0% 2018 up 4.6% flat
15 Sweden 21.0% 2018 up 11.0% flat
16 Ireland 20.8% 2018 up 7.2% flat
17 Germany 20.8% 2018 down 4.1% flat
18 Norway 20.6% 2018 up 4.6% rising
19 Austria 20.6% 2018 up 5.4% flat
20 United Kingdom 20.4% 2018 up 14.2% flat
21 Iceland 20.2% 2018 down 3.4% falling
22 Portugal 19.7% 2018 up 11.5% rising
23 Czechia 19.6% 2018 up 12.7% flat
24 Latvia 19.0% 2018 up 16.1% rising
25 New Zealand 18.9% 2018 down 15.1% falling
26 Slovakia 18.6% 2018 up 2.5% falling
27 Australia 18.2% 2018 down 16.1% falling
28 Italy 18.1% 2018 up 4.5% rising
29 Russia 17.8% 2018 up 40.7% rising
30 Luxembourg 17.7% 2018 down 6.8% flat
31 Spain 17.5% 2018 down 0.6% flat
32 Hungary 17.5% 2018 down 4.5% falling
33 Lithuania 16.5% 2018 up 7.8% flat
34 United States 16.3% 2018 down 4.2% flat
35 Israel 15.4% 2018 up 27.5% rising
36 Croatia 13.0% 2018 up 4.1% flat
37 Serbia 11.7% 2018 up 23.7% rising
38 Greece 11.1% 2018 down 18.5% flat
39 Turkey 10.9% 2018 up 13.4% rising
40 Bulgaria 9.4% 2018 up 15.2% rising
41 Romania 8.5% 2018 up 44.3% rising
42 Montenegro 6.9% 2018 up 81.3% rising
43 Qatar 6.9% 2018 up 64.5% rising
44 Thailand 6.1% 2018 up 24.9% rising
45 Uruguay 6.0% 2018 down 23.5% falling
46 Chile 5.7% 2018 up 1.9% rising
48 Jordan 3.6% 2018 up 67.9% rising
49 Brazil 3.4% 2018 up 15.5% rising
50 Colombia 3.1% 2018 up 90.9% rising
51 Indonesia 2.3% 2018 up 148.0% rising
52 Argentina 2.3% 2018 down 42.5% falling
53 Tunisia 1.8% 2015 down 23.6% rising

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 4
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 303 data points, 2003–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 545 but lower than or equal to 607 on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 4, students can work effectively with explicit models for complex concrete situations that may involve constraints or call for making assumptions. They can select and integrate different representations, including symbolic, linking them directly to aspects of real-world situations. Students at this level can utilize their limited range of skills and can reason with some insight, in straightforward contexts. They can construct and communicate explanations and arguments based on their interpretations, arguments, and actions. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/