Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Botswana
Botswana: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0 GPIA in 2015. ▬ Flat
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Botswana, 2000–2015
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in GPIA.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Botswana is 0 GPIA, measured in 2015. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Botswana peaked at 0 GPIA in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 GPIA, in 2000.
That places Botswana 67th out of 173 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 6 |
| 2010s | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 1 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
- 64 Costa Rica 0.899 GPIA compare
- 65 Qatar 0.8622 GPIA compare
- 66 Turkey 0.7649 GPIA compare
- 67 Afghanistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Albania 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Algeria 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Andorra 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Armenia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Aruba 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bahamas 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bangladesh 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Barbados 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Belize 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Benin 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bermuda 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bhutan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bolivia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Brunei 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bulgaria 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Burkina Faso 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Burundi 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Cape Verde 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Cameroon 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Central African Republic 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Chad 0 GPIA compare
- 67 China 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Colombia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Congo 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Cote d'Ivoire 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Czechia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Djibouti 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Dominican Republic 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Ecuador 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Egypt 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Eritrea 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Eswatini 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Ethiopia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Fiji 0 GPIA compare
- 67 France 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Georgia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Greece 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Guinea 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Guyana 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Honduras 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Hong Kong 0 GPIA compare
- 67 India 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Iran 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Italy 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Japan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Jordan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Kenya 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Kuwait 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Lebanon 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Lesotho 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Liberia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Macao 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Madagascar 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Malawi 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Malaysia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Maldives 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Mali 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Marshall Islands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Monaco 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Mongolia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Mozambique 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Nauru 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Nepal 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Netherlands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Niger 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Oman 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Pakistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Palau 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Papua New Guinea 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Philippines 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Poland 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Portugal 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Samoa 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Saudi Arabia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Senegal 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Seychelles 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Sierra Leone 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Slovakia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Solomon Islands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Sri Lanka 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Sudan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Suriname 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Switzerland 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Syria 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tajikistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tanzania 0 GPIA compare
- 67 East Timor 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Togo 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tonga 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Trinidad and Tobago 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tunisia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tuvalu 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Uganda 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Ukraine 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Uzbekistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Vanuatu 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Palestine 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Zambia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Zimbabwe 0 GPIA compare
More reference data data for Botswana
- Spring temperature anomalies -1.39 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.8179 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -0.391 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 1.76 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies -1.55 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 202.64 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Competitive elections 1 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Botswana?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Botswana was 0 GPIA in 2015, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 0 GPIA in 2000.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 GPIA in 2000.
- How does Botswana rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Botswana ranks 67th out of 173 countries with data for 2015.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/