Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland
Poland: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0 GPIA in 2018. ▬ Flat
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland, 1998–2018
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in GPIA.
Analysis
Poland recorded 0 GPIA for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in 2018. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland peaked at 0 GPIA in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0 GPIA, in 1998.
Poland ranks 67th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 2 |
| 2000s | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 9 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 64 Costa Rica 0.899 GPIA compare
- 65 Qatar 0.8622 GPIA compare
- 66 Turkey 0.7649 GPIA compare
- 67 Afghanistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Albania 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Algeria 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Andorra 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Armenia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Aruba 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bahamas 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bangladesh 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Barbados 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Belize 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Benin 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bermuda 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bhutan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bolivia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Botswana 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Brunei 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bulgaria 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Burkina Faso 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Burundi 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Cape Verde 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Cameroon 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Central African Republic 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Chad 0 GPIA compare
- 67 China 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Colombia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Congo 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Cote d'Ivoire 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Czechia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Djibouti 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Dominican Republic 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Ecuador 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Egypt 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Eritrea 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Eswatini 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Ethiopia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Fiji 0 GPIA compare
- 67 France 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Georgia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Greece 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Guinea 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Guyana 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Honduras 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Hong Kong 0 GPIA compare
- 67 India 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Iran 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Italy 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Japan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Jordan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Kenya 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Kuwait 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Lebanon 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Lesotho 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Liberia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Macao 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Madagascar 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Malawi 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Malaysia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Maldives 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Mali 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Marshall Islands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Monaco 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Mongolia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Mozambique 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Nauru 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Nepal 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Netherlands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Niger 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Oman 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Pakistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Palau 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Papua New Guinea 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Philippines 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Portugal 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Samoa 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Saudi Arabia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Senegal 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Seychelles 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Sierra Leone 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Slovakia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Solomon Islands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Sri Lanka 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Sudan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Suriname 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Switzerland 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Syria 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tajikistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tanzania 0 GPIA compare
- 67 East Timor 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Togo 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tonga 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Trinidad and Tobago 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tunisia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tuvalu 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Uganda 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Ukraine 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Uzbekistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Vanuatu 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Palestine 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Zambia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Zimbabwe 0 GPIA compare
More reference data data for Poland
- Spring temperature anomalies 3.34 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 2.01 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -3.31 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 1.66 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 2.03 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 170.41 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Competitive elections 1 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland was 0 GPIA in 2018, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0 GPIA in 1998.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 GPIA in 1998.
- How does Poland rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Poland ranks 67th out of 173 countries with data for 2018.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/