Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Uganda
Uganda: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0 GPIA in 2017. ▬ Flat
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Uganda, 1998–2017
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in GPIA.
Analysis
In 2017, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Uganda stood at 0 GPIA. That is the highest value across all 19 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Uganda peaked at 0 GPIA in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0 GPIA, in 1998.
Uganda ranks 67th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 1 |
| 2000s | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 8 |
Countries ranked near Uganda
- 64 Costa Rica 0.899 GPIA compare
- 65 Qatar 0.8622 GPIA compare
- 66 Turkey 0.7649 GPIA compare
- 67 Afghanistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Albania 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Algeria 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Andorra 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Armenia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Aruba 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bahamas 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bangladesh 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Barbados 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Belize 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Benin 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bermuda 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bhutan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bolivia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Botswana 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Brunei 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Bulgaria 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Burkina Faso 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Burundi 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Cape Verde 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Cameroon 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Central African Republic 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Chad 0 GPIA compare
- 67 China 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Colombia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Congo 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Cote d'Ivoire 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Czechia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Dominican Republic 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Ecuador 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Egypt 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Eritrea 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Eswatini 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Ethiopia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Fiji 0 GPIA compare
- 67 France 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Georgia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Greece 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Guinea 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Guyana 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Honduras 0 GPIA compare
- 67 India 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Iran 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Italy 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Japan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Jordan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Kenya 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Kuwait 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Lebanon 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Lesotho 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Liberia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Liechtenstein 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Luxembourg 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Macao 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Madagascar 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Malawi 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Malaysia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Maldives 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Mali 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Malta 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Marshall Islands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Monaco 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Mongolia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Mozambique 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Nauru 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Nepal 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Netherlands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Niger 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Oman 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Pakistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Palau 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Papua New Guinea 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Philippines 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Poland 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Portugal 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Samoa 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Saudi Arabia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Senegal 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Seychelles 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Sierra Leone 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Slovakia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Solomon Islands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Sri Lanka 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Sudan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Suriname 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Switzerland 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Syria 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tajikistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tanzania 0 GPIA compare
- 67 East Timor 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Togo 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tonga 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Trinidad and Tobago 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tunisia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Tuvalu 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Ukraine 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Uzbekistan 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Vanuatu 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Palestine 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Zambia 0 GPIA compare
- 67 Zimbabwe 0 GPIA compare
More reference data data for Uganda
- Temperature anomalies by month 1.03 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 1.94 °C (2026)
- Spring temperature anomalies -0.9521 °C (2026)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 0.7925 °C (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Consumer price index 224.68 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 0.4723 °C (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Annual precipitation 1,308 millimeters (2025)
- Elected parliament 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Uganda?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Uganda was 0 GPIA in 2017, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 0 GPIA in 1998.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 GPIA in 1998.
- How does Uganda rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Uganda ranks 67th out of 173 countries with data for 2017.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/