Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Cuba
Cuba: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Cuba, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for government effectiveness - governance estimate in Cuba is -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 0.6% on the previous year and down 651.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Cuba peaked at -0.0528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014 and was at its lowest, -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Cuba 138th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Cuba, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.8551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.1% |
| 2000 | -0.4767 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -44.3% |
| 2002 | -0.8299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +74.1% |
| 2003 | -0.8312 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2004 | -0.575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -30.8% |
| 2005 | -0.9998 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +73.9% |
| 2006 | -0.4492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -55.1% |
| 2007 | -0.4487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2008 | -0.4251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
| 2009 | -0.4244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2010 | -0.5966 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +40.6% |
| 2011 | -0.5969 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2012 | -0.4713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -21.1% |
| 2013 | -0.4714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | -0.0528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -88.8% |
| 2015 | -0.0532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2016 | -0.0892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +67.8% |
| 2017 | -0.1356 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +52.1% |
| 2018 | -0.3212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +136.8% |
| 2019 | -0.2237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -30.4% |
| 2020 | -0.2269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2021 | -0.2341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2022 | -0.1146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -51.1% |
| 2023 | -0.1404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +22.6% |
| 2024 | -0.4018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +186.1% |
| 2025 | -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 17.3× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Cuba's -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9835 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.6067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9998 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.3012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5969 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2529 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 135 Marshall Islands -0.3531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 136 Kiribati -0.3649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 137 Zambia -0.3897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 139 Cambodia -0.4006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 140 Puerto Rico -0.4244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 141 Gambia -0.4322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Cuba?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Cuba was -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Cuba rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Cuba ranks 138th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 651.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.