Cuba vs Marshall Islands: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Cuba
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -0.2695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.0214 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Cuba ranks 125th and Marshall Islands ranks 127th of 204 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.5371 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cuba |
| 2010s | -0.2565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cuba |
| 2020s | -0.0918 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Cuba or Marshall Islands?
- Cuba, at -0.2695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Marshall Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Cuba and Marshall Islands?
- 0.0214 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Marshall Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Marshall Islands rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Cuba ranks 125th and Marshall Islands ranks 127th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.