Cuba vs Kiribati: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Cuba
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports -0.3649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cuba, a difference of 0.0343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.
Cuba ranks 138th and Kiribati ranks 136th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.5537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | -0.3012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5203 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cuba |
| 2020s | -0.2529 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3601 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Cuba or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at -0.3649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Cuba and Kiribati?
- 0.0343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kiribati?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Kiribati rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Cuba ranks 138th and Kiribati ranks 136th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.