Marshall Islands vs Sierra Leone: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Marshall Islands
44.44
in 2019
Sierra Leone
44.44
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
94th
Sierra Leone rank
94th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Marshall Islands
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 94th and Sierra Leone ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Marshall Islands or Sierra Leone?
- Marshall Islands, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Marshall Islands and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Sierra Leone?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Sierra Leone rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Marshall Islands ranks 94th and Sierra Leone ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.