Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Samoa
Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▼ Falling
Latest (2019)
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
151st
of 191 countries
All-time high
6.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2016
Years of data
5
2015–2019
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Samoa, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Samoa stood at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 15.4% over five years.
Samoa ranks 151st of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Samoa, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 5.5 DB17-20 methodology | -15.4% |
| 2017 | 5.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Samoa compared with similar countries
- Samoa's 5.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 8.5 DB17-20 methodology, 65% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Samoa's 5.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 7.75 DB17-20 methodology, 71% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Samoa
- 150 Pakistan 5.65 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Algeria 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Angola 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Central African Republic 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Comoros 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Democratic Republic of Congo 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Djibouti 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Maldives 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Mongolia 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 San Marino 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Togo 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Samoa
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.023 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0396 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0396 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0626 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0918 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1693 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Samoa?
- Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Samoa was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Samoa?
- The highest recorded value was 6.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Samoa?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2016.
- How does Samoa rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Samoa ranks 151st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Samoa data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.