What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Samoa?

0 DB17-20 methodology, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Samoa?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)

Democratic Republic of the Congo

5.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Samoa

5.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Democratic Republic of the Congo rank

150th

Samoa rank

150th

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time

Democratic Republic of the Congo
Samoa

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Samoa, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 150th and Samoa ranks 150th of 190 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Democratic Republic of the Congo or Samoa?: Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Samoa?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Samoa?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?: Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 150th and Samoa ranks 150th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18). Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/samoa/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.