Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Mongolia
Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Mongolia, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Mongolia stood at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
That places Mongolia 151st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Mongolia, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 5.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Mongolia compared with similar countries
- Mongolia's 5.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 8.5 DB17-20 methodology, 65% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Mongolia's 5.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 7.75 DB17-20 methodology, 71% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Mongolia
- 150 Pakistan 5.65 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Algeria 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Angola 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Central African Republic 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Comoros 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Democratic Republic of Congo 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Djibouti 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Maldives 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Samoa 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 San Marino 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 151 Togo 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Mongolia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8173 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0069 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 12.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0378 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Mongolia?
- Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Mongolia was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Mongolia rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Mongolia ranks 151st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.