Samoa vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Samoa
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa rank
151st
San Marino rank
151st
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Samoa
- San Marino
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Samoa ahead.
Samoa ranks 151st and San Marino ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Samoa or San Marino?
- Samoa, at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Samoa and San Marino?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and San Marino rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Samoa ranks 151st and San Marino ranks 151st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.