Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Algeria

Algeria: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
150th
of 190 countries
All-time high
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Algeria, 2015–2019

02462015201720192015: 5.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 5.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 5.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 5.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 5.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Algeria stood at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Algeria ranks 150th of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Algeria

  1. 149 Pakistan 5.65 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 150 Angola 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 150 Central African Republic 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 150 Comoros 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 150 Democratic Republic of the Congo 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 150 Djibouti 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 150 Maldives 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 150 Mongolia 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 150 Samoa 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  10. 150 San Marino 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  11. 150 Togo 5.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Algeria

All data for Algeria β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Algeria?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Algeria was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Algeria?
The highest recorded value was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Algeria?
The lowest recorded value was 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Algeria rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Algeria ranks 150th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Algeria data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Algeria. Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/algeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/algeria/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Algeria</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.