Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Lithuania

Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 68.75 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
68.75
Change on year
up 4.8%
World rank
24th
of 184 countries
All-time high
68.75
in 2014
All-time low
65.62
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Lithuania, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 65.62004: 65.62005: 65.62006: 65.62007: 65.62008: 65.62009: 65.62010: 65.62011: 65.62012: 65.62013: 65.62014: 68.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Lithuania stood at 68.75. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.8% on the previous year and up 4.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Lithuania peaked at 68.75 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 65.62, in 2003.

Lithuania ranks 24th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Lithuania, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 65.62
2004 65.62 +0.0%
2005 65.62 +0.0%
2006 65.62 +0.0%
2007 65.62 +0.0%
2008 65.62 +0.0%
2009 65.62 +0.0%
2010 65.62 +0.0%
2011 65.62 +0.0%
2012 65.62 +0.0%
2013 65.62 +0.0%
2014 68.75 +4.8%

Lithuania compared with similar countries

  • Lithuania's 68.75 is above the median for high income countries, which is 59.38, 1.2× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Lithuania's 68.75 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 59.38, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 65.62 65.62 65.62 7
2010s 66.25 65.62 68.75 5

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 24 Germany 68.75 compare
  2. 24 Guatemala 68.75 compare
  3. 24 Moldova 68.75 compare
  4. 24 Sweden 68.75 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Lithuania?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Lithuania was 68.75 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 68.75 in 2014.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 65.62 in 2003.
How does Lithuania rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Lithuania ranks 24th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Lithuania. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/lithuania/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.