Guatemala vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Guatemala
68.75
in 2014
Lithuania
68.75
in 2014
Guatemala rank
24th
Lithuania rank
24th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Guatemala
  • Lithuania
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 68.75 against 68.75 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 24th of 181 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 68.75 65.62 3.12 Guatemala
2010s 68.75 66.25 2.5 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Guatemala or Lithuania?
Guatemala, at 68.75 against 68.75 in Lithuania as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Guatemala and Lithuania?
0, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lithuania?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Guatemala and Lithuania rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Guatemala ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.