Lithuania vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Lithuania
68.75
in 2014
Sweden
68.75
in 2014
Lithuania rank
24th
Sweden rank
24th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sweden
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 68.75 against 68.75 in Sweden, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 24th of 181 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 65.62 68.75 3.12 Sweden
2010s 66.25 68.75 2.5 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Lithuania or Sweden?
Lithuania, at 68.75 against 68.75 in Sweden as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Lithuania and Sweden?
0, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Lithuania ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.