Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guatemala

Guatemala: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 68.75 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
68.75
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
24th
of 184 countries
All-time high
68.75
in 2003
All-time low
68.75
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guatemala, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 68.82004: 68.82005: 68.82006: 68.82007: 68.82008: 68.82009: 68.82010: 68.82011: 68.82012: 68.82013: 68.82014: 68.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guatemala is 68.75, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guatemala peaked at 68.75 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 68.75, in 2003.

Guatemala ranks 24th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guatemala, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guatemala, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 68.75
2004 68.75 +0.0%
2005 68.75 +0.0%
2006 68.75 +0.0%
2007 68.75 +0.0%
2008 68.75 +0.0%
2009 68.75 +0.0%
2010 68.75 +0.0%
2011 68.75 +0.0%
2012 68.75 +0.0%
2013 68.75 +0.0%
2014 68.75 +0.0%

Guatemala compared with similar countries

  • Guatemala's 68.75 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50, 1.4× the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Guatemala's 68.75 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 42.19, 1.6× the median. (32 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 68.75 68.75 68.75 7
2010s 68.75 68.75 68.75 5

Countries ranked near Guatemala

  1. 24 Germany 68.75 compare
  2. 24 Lithuania 68.75 compare
  3. 24 Moldova 68.75 compare
  4. 24 Sweden 68.75 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Guatemala

All data for Guatemala →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guatemala?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guatemala was 68.75 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Guatemala?
The highest recorded value was 68.75 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Guatemala?
The lowest recorded value was 68.75 in 2003.
How does Guatemala rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Guatemala ranks 24th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Guatemala?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Guatemala data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guatemala. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/guatemala/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guatemala</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.