Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Moldova

Moldova: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 68.75 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
68.75
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
24th
of 184 countries
All-time high
71.88
in 2003
All-time low
68.75
in 2012
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Moldova, 2003–2014

0204060802003200820142003: 71.92004: 71.92005: 71.92006: 71.92007: 71.92008: 71.92009: 71.92010: 71.92011: 71.92012: 68.82013: 68.82014: 68.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Moldova stood at 68.75. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Moldova peaked at 71.88 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 68.75, in 2012.

Moldova ranks 24th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Moldova, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 71.88
2004 71.88 +0.0%
2005 71.88 +0.0%
2006 71.88 +0.0%
2007 71.88 +0.0%
2008 71.88 +0.0%
2009 71.88 +0.0%
2010 71.88 +0.0%
2011 71.88 +0.0%
2012 68.75 -4.3%
2013 68.75 +0.0%
2014 68.75 +0.0%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 68.75 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50, 1.4× the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 68.75 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 59.38, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 71.88 71.88 71.88 7
2010s 70 68.75 71.88 5

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 24 Germany 68.75 compare
  2. 24 Guatemala 68.75 compare
  3. 24 Lithuania 68.75 compare
  4. 24 Sweden 68.75 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Moldova?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Moldova was 68.75 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 71.88 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 68.75 in 2012.
How does Moldova rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Moldova ranks 24th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Moldova. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/moldova/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.