Cambodia vs Central African Republic: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Cambodia
31.75
in 2019
Central African Republic
31.39
in 2019
Cambodia rank
180th
Central African Republic rank
181st

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • Central African Republic
0102030201520172019

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 31.75 against 31.39 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.36.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 180th and Central African Republic ranks 181st of 188 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cambodia or Central African Republic?
Cambodia, at 31.75 against 31.39 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cambodia and Central African Republic?
0.36, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Central African Republic?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cambodia and Central African Republic rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Cambodia ranks 180th and Central African Republic ranks 181st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.