Angola vs Central African Republic: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Angola
28.11
in 2019
Central African Republic
31.39
in 2019
Angola rank
184th
Central African Republic rank
181st

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Angola
  • Central African Republic
0102030201520172019

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 31.39 against 28.11 in Angola, a difference of 3.28.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 184th and Central African Republic ranks 181st of 188 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Angola or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at 31.39 against 28.11 in Angola as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Angola and Central African Republic?
3.28, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Central African Republic?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Angola and Central African Republic rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Angola ranks 184th and Central African Republic ranks 181st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.