Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Nigeria
Nigeria: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 4.16 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Nigeria, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Nigeria stood at 4.16 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
Nigeria ranks 53rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Nigeria, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4.16 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 4.16 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4.16 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4.16 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4.16 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Nigeria compared with similar countries
- Nigeria's 4.16 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 1.4× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Nigeria's 4.16 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 1.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Nigeria
- 52 United States 4.4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 54 Brazil 4.08 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Burkina Faso 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Canada 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Guyana 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Haiti 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Kuwait 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Lebanon 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Liberia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Malaysia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Mozambique 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Oman 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Papua New Guinea 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Saudi Arabia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Uganda 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Nigeria
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 19.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 81.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 121.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 14.27 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Nigeria?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Nigeria was 4.16 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Nigeria?
- The highest recorded value was 4.16 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Nigeria?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.16 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Nigeria rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Nigeria ranks 53rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Nigeria data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.