Burkina Faso vs Nigeria: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Burkina Faso
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Nigeria
4.16 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
55th
Nigeria rank
53rd

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Nigeria
01234201520172019

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 4.16 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.16 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 55th and Nigeria ranks 53rd of 191 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Burkina Faso or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 4.16 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Burkina Faso and Nigeria?
0.16 DB17-20 methodology, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Nigeria?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Burkina Faso and Nigeria rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Burkina Faso ranks 55th and Nigeria ranks 53rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Nigeria: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/burkina-faso/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/burkina-faso/nigeria/">Burkina Faso vs Nigeria: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.