Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Haiti
Haiti: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Haiti, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Haiti is 4 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Haiti 55th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Haiti, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Haiti compared with similar countries
- Haiti's 4 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 1.3× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Haiti's 4 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 1.1× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Haiti
- 52 United States 4.4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 53 Nigeria 4.16 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 54 Brazil 4.08 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Burkina Faso 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Canada 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Guyana 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Kuwait 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Lebanon 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Liberia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Malaysia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Mozambique 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Oman 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Papua New Guinea 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Saudi Arabia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Uganda 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Haiti
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2934 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0485 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9837 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6522 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2643 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Haiti?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Haiti was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Haiti?
- The highest recorded value was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Haiti?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Haiti rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Haiti ranks 55th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Haiti data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.