Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Liberia
Liberia: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Liberia, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Liberia is 4 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
Liberia ranks 55th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Liberia, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Liberia compared with similar countries
- Liberia's 4 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for low income countries, which is 3.25 DB17-20 methodology, 1.2× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Liberia's 4 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Liberia
- 52 United States 4.4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 53 Nigeria 4.16 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 54 Brazil 4.08 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Burkina Faso 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Canada 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Guyana 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Haiti 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Kuwait 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Lebanon 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Malaysia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Mozambique 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Oman 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Papua New Guinea 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Saudi Arabia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 55 Uganda 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Liberia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0476 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1282 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.229 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0532 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.229 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1597 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.183 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5564 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2896 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Liberia?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Liberia was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Liberia?
- The highest recorded value was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Liberia?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Liberia rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Liberia ranks 55th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Liberia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.