Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Zambia
Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Zambia, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Zambia stood at 1.5 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Zambia 170th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Zambia, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Zambia compared with similar countries
- Zambia's 1.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 60% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zambia's 1.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 60% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 170 Albania 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Azerbaijan 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Burundi 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Chile 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Eritrea 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Ethiopia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Iraq 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Kiribati 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Kyrgyzstan 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Liberia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Malawi 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Myanmar 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Netherlands 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 San Marino 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Sao Tome and Principe 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Sierra Leone 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Tanzania 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 170 Ukraine 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Zambia
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 18.94 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 18.94 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 18.94 (2026)
- Political opposition, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament and government, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled 0 events (2025)
- Annual precipitation, annual growth rate 40.84 % change on previous year (2025)
- Free country, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, gaps filled 4 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Zambia?
- Enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Zambia was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Zambia rank for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Zambia ranks 170th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.