Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Tanzania

Tanzania: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
167th
of 188 countries
All-time high
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Tanzania, 2015–2019

00.511.52015201720192015: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology2016: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology2017: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology2018: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology2019: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

Tanzania recorded 1.5 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

Tanzania ranks 167th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Tanzania

  1. 167 Albania 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 167 Azerbaijan 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 167 Burundi 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 167 Chile 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 167 Eritrea 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 167 Ethiopia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 167 Iraq 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 167 Kiribati 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 167 Kyrgyzstan 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 167 Liberia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 167 Malawi 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 167 Myanmar 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 167 Netherlands 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 167 San Marino 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 167 Sao Tome and Principe 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 167 Sierra Leone 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 167 Ukraine 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 167 Zambia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Tanzania

All data for Tanzania →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Tanzania?
Enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Tanzania was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Tanzania?
The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Tanzania?
The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Tanzania rank for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Tanzania ranks 167th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Tanzania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.