Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)

Sao Tome and Principe
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Zambia
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
170th
Zambia rank
170th

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Zambia
00.511.5201520172019

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 170th and Zambia ranks 170th of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Sao Tome and Principe or Zambia?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 170th and Zambia ranks 170th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/sao-tome-and-principe/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/sao-tome-and-principe/zambia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.