Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Kiribati

Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
170th
of 191 countries
All-time high
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Kiribati, 2015–2019

00.511.52015201720192015: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology2016: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology2017: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology2018: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology2019: 1.5 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Kiribati is 1.5 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Kiribati ranks 170th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Kiribati, year by year

Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2015 1.5 DB16-20 methodology —
2016 1.5 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 1.5 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 1.5 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 1.5 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%

Kiribati compared with similar countries

  • Kiribati's 1.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 60% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Kiribati's 1.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, 60% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 170 Albania 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 170 Azerbaijan 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 170 Burundi 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 170 Chile 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 170 Eritrea 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 170 Ethiopia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 170 Iraq 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 170 Kyrgyzstan 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 170 Liberia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 170 Malawi 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 170 Myanmar 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 170 Netherlands 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 170 San Marino 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 170 Sao Tome and Principe 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 170 Sierra Leone 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 170 Tanzania 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 170 Ukraine 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 170 Zambia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Kiribati?
Enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Kiribati was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Kiribati rank for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Kiribati ranks 170th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Kiribati. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/kiribati/">Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.