San Marino vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- San Marino
- Zambia
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 169th and Zambia ranks 169th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), San Marino or Zambia?
- San Marino, at 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between San Marino and Zambia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Zambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- San Marino ranks 169th and Zambia ranks 169th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.