Statizoid

Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data in Kosovo

Kosovo: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data was 0 in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
0
Rank
2nd
of 2 groups
All-time high
0
in 2004
All-time low
0
in 2004
Years of data
20
2004–2023

Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data in Kosovo, 2004–2023

00.20.40.60.812004201320232004: 02005: 02006: 02007: 02008: 02009: 02010: 02011: 02012: 02013: 02014: 02015: 02016: 02017: 02018: 02019: 02020: 02021: 02022: 02023: 0

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

In 2023, dimension 4.2: administrative data in Kosovo stood at 0. That is the highest value across all 20 years on record.

Over the whole period, dimension 4.2: administrative data in Kosovo peaked at 0 in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2004.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 0 0 6
2010s 0 0 0 10
2020s 0 0 0 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 1 Albania 1 compare
  2. 1 Algeria 1 compare
  3. 1 American Samoa 1 compare
  4. 1 Andorra 1 compare
  5. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 1 compare
  6. 1 Argentina 1 compare
  7. 1 Armenia 1 compare
  8. 1 Aruba 1 compare
  9. 1 Australia 1 compare
  10. 1 Austria 1 compare
  11. 1 Azerbaijan 1 compare
  12. 1 Bahrain 1 compare
  13. 1 Barbados 1 compare
  14. 1 Belarus 1 compare
  15. 1 Belgium 1 compare
  16. 1 Belize 1 compare
  17. 1 Bermuda 1 compare
  18. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
  19. 1 Botswana 1 compare
  20. 1 Brazil 1 compare
  21. 1 British Virgin Islands 1 compare
  22. 1 Brunei 1 compare
  23. 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
  24. 1 Cape Verde 1 compare
  25. 1 Canada 1 compare
  26. 1 Cayman Islands 1 compare
  27. 1 Chile 1 compare
  28. 1 Colombia 1 compare
  29. 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
  30. 1 Croatia 1 compare
  31. 1 Cuba 1 compare
  32. 1 Curacao 1 compare
  33. 1 Cyprus 1 compare
  34. 1 Czechia 1 compare
  35. 1 Denmark 1 compare
  36. 1 Dominica 1 compare
  37. 1 Egypt 1 compare
  38. 1 El Salvador 1 compare
  39. 1 Estonia 1 compare
  40. 1 Faroe Islands 1 compare
  41. 1 Finland 1 compare
  42. 1 France 1 compare
  43. 1 French Polynesia 1 compare
  44. 1 Georgia 1 compare
  45. 1 Germany 1 compare
  46. 1 Gibraltar 1 compare
  47. 1 Greece 1 compare
  48. 1 Greenland 1 compare
  49. 1 Grenada 1 compare
  50. 1 Guam 1 compare
  51. 1 Guatemala 1 compare
  52. 1 Hong Kong 1 compare
  53. 1 Hungary 1 compare
  54. 1 Iceland 1 compare
  55. 1 India 1 compare
  56. 1 Iran 1 compare
  57. 1 Ireland 1 compare
  58. 1 Isle of Man 1 compare
  59. 1 Israel 1 compare
  60. 1 Italy 1 compare
  61. 1 Jamaica 1 compare
  62. 1 Japan 1 compare
  63. 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
  64. 1 South Korea 1 compare
  65. 1 Kuwait 1 compare
  66. 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
  67. 1 Latvia 1 compare
  68. 1 Lebanon 1 compare
  69. 1 Liechtenstein 1 compare
  70. 1 Lithuania 1 compare
  71. 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
  72. 1 Macao 1 compare
  73. 1 Malaysia 1 compare
  74. 1 Maldives 1 compare
  75. 1 Malta 1 compare
  76. 1 Mauritius 1 compare
  77. 1 Mexico 1 compare
  78. 1 Moldova 1 compare
  79. 1 Monaco 1 compare
  80. 1 Mongolia 1 compare
  81. 1 Montenegro 1 compare
  82. 1 Morocco 1 compare
  83. 1 Nauru 1 compare
  84. 1 Netherlands 1 compare
  85. 1 New Caledonia 1 compare
  86. 1 New Zealand 1 compare
  87. 1 North Macedonia 1 compare
  88. 1 Northern Mariana Islands 1 compare
  89. 1 Norway 1 compare
  90. 1 Oman 1 compare
  91. 1 Palau 1 compare
  92. 1 Panama 1 compare
  93. 1 Philippines 1 compare
  94. 1 Poland 1 compare
  95. 1 Portugal 1 compare
  96. 1 Puerto Rico 1 compare
  97. 1 Qatar 1 compare
  98. 1 Romania 1 compare
  99. 1 Russia 1 compare
  100. 1 San Marino 1 compare
  101. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
  102. 1 Saudi Arabia 1 compare
  103. 1 Serbia 1 compare
  104. 1 Seychelles 1 compare
  105. 1 Singapore 1 compare
  106. 1 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 1 compare
  107. 1 Slovakia 1 compare
  108. 1 Slovenia 1 compare
  109. 1 South Africa 1 compare
  110. 1 Spain 1 compare
  111. 1 Sri Lanka 1 compare
  112. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 compare
  113. 1 Saint Lucia 1 compare
  114. 1 Saint Martin (French part) 1 compare
  115. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 compare
  116. 1 Suriname 1 compare
  117. 1 Sweden 1 compare
  118. 1 Switzerland 1 compare
  119. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 compare
  120. 1 Tunisia 1 compare
  121. 1 Turkey 1 compare
  122. 1 Turks and Caicos Islands 1 compare
  123. 1 Ukraine 1 compare
  124. 1 United Arab Emirates 1 compare
  125. 1 United Kingdom 1 compare
  126. 1 United States 1 compare
  127. 1 Uruguay 1 compare
  128. 1 Uzbekistan 1 compare
  129. 1 United States Virgin Islands 1 compare

See the full ranking of 217 places →

More reference data data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 4.2: administrative data in Kosovo?
Dimension 4.2: administrative data in Kosovo was 0 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 4.2: administrative data recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 0 in 2004.
What is the lowest dimension 4.2: administrative data recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2004.
How does Kosovo rank for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
Kosovo ranks 2nd out of 2 groups with data for 2023.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.