Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data in Australia
Australia: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data was 1 in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data in Australia, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
Australia recorded 1 for dimension 4.2: administrative data in 2023. That is the highest value across all 20 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
Over the whole period, dimension 4.2: administrative data in Australia peaked at 1 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2004.
That places Australia 1st out of 214 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Australia
- 1 Albania 1 compare
- 1 Algeria 1 compare
- 1 American Samoa 1 compare
- 1 Andorra 1 compare
- 1 Antigua and Barbuda 1 compare
- 1 Argentina 1 compare
- 1 Armenia 1 compare
- 1 Aruba 1 compare
- 1 Austria 1 compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 1 compare
- 1 Bahrain 1 compare
- 1 Barbados 1 compare
- 1 Belarus 1 compare
- 1 Belgium 1 compare
- 1 Belize 1 compare
- 1 Bermuda 1 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 1 Botswana 1 compare
- 1 Brazil 1 compare
- 1 British Virgin Islands 1 compare
- 1 Brunei 1 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 1 compare
- 1 Canada 1 compare
- 1 Cayman Islands 1 compare
- 1 Chile 1 compare
- 1 Colombia 1 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
- 1 Croatia 1 compare
- 1 Cuba 1 compare
- 1 Curacao 1 compare
- 1 Cyprus 1 compare
- 1 Czechia 1 compare
- 1 Denmark 1 compare
- 1 Dominica 1 compare
- 1 Egypt 1 compare
- 1 El Salvador 1 compare
- 1 Estonia 1 compare
- 1 Faroe Islands 1 compare
- 1 Finland 1 compare
- 1 France 1 compare
- 1 French Polynesia 1 compare
- 1 Georgia 1 compare
- 1 Germany 1 compare
- 1 Gibraltar 1 compare
- 1 Greece 1 compare
- 1 Greenland 1 compare
- 1 Grenada 1 compare
- 1 Guam 1 compare
- 1 Guatemala 1 compare
- 1 Hong Kong 1 compare
- 1 Hungary 1 compare
- 1 Iceland 1 compare
- 1 India 1 compare
- 1 Iran 1 compare
- 1 Ireland 1 compare
- 1 Isle of Man 1 compare
- 1 Israel 1 compare
- 1 Italy 1 compare
- 1 Jamaica 1 compare
- 1 Japan 1 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 1 South Korea 1 compare
- 1 Kuwait 1 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
- 1 Latvia 1 compare
- 1 Lebanon 1 compare
- 1 Liechtenstein 1 compare
- 1 Lithuania 1 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
- 1 Macao 1 compare
- 1 Malaysia 1 compare
- 1 Maldives 1 compare
- 1 Malta 1 compare
- 1 Mauritius 1 compare
- 1 Mexico 1 compare
- 1 Moldova 1 compare
- 1 Monaco 1 compare
- 1 Mongolia 1 compare
- 1 Montenegro 1 compare
- 1 Morocco 1 compare
- 1 Nauru 1 compare
- 1 Netherlands 1 compare
- 1 New Caledonia 1 compare
- 1 New Zealand 1 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 1 compare
- 1 Northern Mariana Islands 1 compare
- 1 Norway 1 compare
- 1 Oman 1 compare
- 1 Palau 1 compare
- 1 Panama 1 compare
- 1 Philippines 1 compare
- 1 Poland 1 compare
- 1 Portugal 1 compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 1 compare
- 1 Qatar 1 compare
- 1 Romania 1 compare
- 1 Russia 1 compare
- 1 San Marino 1 compare
- 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 1 compare
- 1 Serbia 1 compare
- 1 Seychelles 1 compare
- 1 Singapore 1 compare
- 1 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 1 compare
- 1 Slovakia 1 compare
- 1 Slovenia 1 compare
- 1 South Africa 1 compare
- 1 Spain 1 compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 1 compare
- 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 compare
- 1 Saint Lucia 1 compare
- 1 Saint Martin (French part) 1 compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 compare
- 1 Suriname 1 compare
- 1 Sweden 1 compare
- 1 Switzerland 1 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 compare
- 1 Tunisia 1 compare
- 1 Turkey 1 compare
- 1 Turks and Caicos Islands 1 compare
- 1 Ukraine 1 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 1 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 1 compare
- 1 United States 1 compare
- 1 Uruguay 1 compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 1 United States Virgin Islands 1 compare
More reference data data for Australia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 28.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 6.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 118.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 170.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 13.9 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 4.2: administrative data in Australia?
- Dimension 4.2: administrative data in Australia was 1 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 4.2: administrative data recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 2015.
- What is the lowest dimension 4.2: administrative data recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2004.
- How does Australia rank for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- Australia ranks 1st out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.