Costa Rica vs Kosovo: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data

Costa Rica
1
in 2023
Kosovo
0
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
1st
Kosovo rank
2nd

Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Kosovo
00.20.40.60.81200420132023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 0 in Kosovo, a difference of 1.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kosovo ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 2nd of 214 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Kosovo Difference Ahead
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0.5 0 0.5 Costa Rica
2020s 1 0 1 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, Costa Rica or Kosovo?
Costa Rica, at 1 against 0 in Kosovo as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between Costa Rica and Kosovo?
1, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kosovo?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Kosovo rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 2nd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.