Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data in South Africa
South Africa: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data was 1 in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data in South Africa, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
The most recent figure for dimension 4.2: administrative data in South Africa is 1, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 20 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
Over the whole period, dimension 4.2: administrative data in South Africa peaked at 1 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2004.
That places South Africa 1st out of 214 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
- 1 Albania 1 compare
- 1 Algeria 1 compare
- 1 American Samoa 1 compare
- 1 Andorra 1 compare
- 1 Antigua and Barbuda 1 compare
- 1 Argentina 1 compare
- 1 Armenia 1 compare
- 1 Aruba 1 compare
- 1 Australia 1 compare
- 1 Austria 1 compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 1 compare
- 1 Bahrain 1 compare
- 1 Barbados 1 compare
- 1 Belarus 1 compare
- 1 Belgium 1 compare
- 1 Belize 1 compare
- 1 Bermuda 1 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 1 Botswana 1 compare
- 1 Brazil 1 compare
- 1 British Virgin Islands 1 compare
- 1 Brunei 1 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 1 compare
- 1 Canada 1 compare
- 1 Cayman Islands 1 compare
- 1 Chile 1 compare
- 1 Colombia 1 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
- 1 Croatia 1 compare
- 1 Cuba 1 compare
- 1 Curacao 1 compare
- 1 Cyprus 1 compare
- 1 Czechia 1 compare
- 1 Denmark 1 compare
- 1 Dominica 1 compare
- 1 Egypt 1 compare
- 1 El Salvador 1 compare
- 1 Estonia 1 compare
- 1 Faroe Islands 1 compare
- 1 Finland 1 compare
- 1 France 1 compare
- 1 French Polynesia 1 compare
- 1 Georgia 1 compare
- 1 Germany 1 compare
- 1 Gibraltar 1 compare
- 1 Greece 1 compare
- 1 Greenland 1 compare
- 1 Grenada 1 compare
- 1 Guam 1 compare
- 1 Guatemala 1 compare
- 1 Hong Kong 1 compare
- 1 Hungary 1 compare
- 1 Iceland 1 compare
- 1 India 1 compare
- 1 Iran 1 compare
- 1 Ireland 1 compare
- 1 Isle of Man 1 compare
- 1 Israel 1 compare
- 1 Italy 1 compare
- 1 Jamaica 1 compare
- 1 Japan 1 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 1 South Korea 1 compare
- 1 Kuwait 1 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
- 1 Latvia 1 compare
- 1 Lebanon 1 compare
- 1 Liechtenstein 1 compare
- 1 Lithuania 1 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
- 1 Macao 1 compare
- 1 Malaysia 1 compare
- 1 Maldives 1 compare
- 1 Malta 1 compare
- 1 Mauritius 1 compare
- 1 Mexico 1 compare
- 1 Moldova 1 compare
- 1 Monaco 1 compare
- 1 Mongolia 1 compare
- 1 Montenegro 1 compare
- 1 Morocco 1 compare
- 1 Nauru 1 compare
- 1 Netherlands 1 compare
- 1 New Caledonia 1 compare
- 1 New Zealand 1 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 1 compare
- 1 Northern Mariana Islands 1 compare
- 1 Norway 1 compare
- 1 Oman 1 compare
- 1 Palau 1 compare
- 1 Panama 1 compare
- 1 Philippines 1 compare
- 1 Poland 1 compare
- 1 Portugal 1 compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 1 compare
- 1 Qatar 1 compare
- 1 Romania 1 compare
- 1 Russia 1 compare
- 1 San Marino 1 compare
- 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 1 compare
- 1 Serbia 1 compare
- 1 Seychelles 1 compare
- 1 Singapore 1 compare
- 1 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 1 compare
- 1 Slovakia 1 compare
- 1 Slovenia 1 compare
- 1 Spain 1 compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 1 compare
- 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 compare
- 1 Saint Lucia 1 compare
- 1 Saint Martin (French part) 1 compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 compare
- 1 Suriname 1 compare
- 1 Sweden 1 compare
- 1 Switzerland 1 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 compare
- 1 Tunisia 1 compare
- 1 Turkey 1 compare
- 1 Turks and Caicos Islands 1 compare
- 1 Ukraine 1 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 1 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 1 compare
- 1 United States 1 compare
- 1 Uruguay 1 compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 1 United States Virgin Islands 1 compare
More reference data data for South Africa
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7468 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 41.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 63.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.07 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 4.2: administrative data in South Africa?
- Dimension 4.2: administrative data in South Africa was 1 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 4.2: administrative data recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 2015.
- What is the lowest dimension 4.2: administrative data recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2004.
- How does South Africa rank for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- South Africa ranks 1st out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.