Kosovo vs Sweden: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data

Kosovo
0
in 2023
Sweden
1
in 2023
Kosovo rank
2nd
Sweden rank
1st

Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time

  • Kosovo
  • Sweden
00.20.40.60.81200420132023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 1 against 0 in Kosovo, a difference of 1.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Kosovo ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 1st of 2 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kosovo Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0 0.5 0.5 Sweden
2020s 0 1 1 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, Kosovo or Sweden?
Sweden, at 1 against 0 in Kosovo as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between Kosovo and Sweden?
1, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Sweden?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Kosovo and Sweden rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
Kosovo ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 1st of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.