The demographic transition in Sweden in China
China: The demographic transition in Sweden was 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009. ▼ Falling
Latest (2009)
12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
34th
of 56 countries
All-time high
43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1963
All-time low
7.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1998
Years of data
61
1949–2009
The demographic transition in Sweden in China, 1949–2009
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
The most recent figure for the demographic transition in sweden in China is 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population), measured in 2009.
That represents a change of down 0.1% on the previous year and down 20.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in China peaked at 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1963 and was at its lowest, 7.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1998.
China ranks 34th of 56 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 61 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in China, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1949 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1950 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1951 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1952 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1953 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1955 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.2% |
| 1956 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1957 | 34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.6% |
| 1958 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.1% |
| 1959 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -15.1% |
| 1960 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -15.7% |
| 1961 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.9% |
| 1962 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +105.6% |
| 1963 | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.3% |
| 1964 | 39.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.9% |
| 1965 | 37.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1966 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.7% |
| 1967 | 34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1968 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1969 | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1970 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1971 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.4% |
| 1972 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1973 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1974 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.1% |
| 1975 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1976 | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.5% |
| 1977 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1978 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1979 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1980 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1981 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +14.8% |
| 1982 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1983 | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.8% |
| 1984 | 17.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1985 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1986 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +16.9% |
| 1987 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1990 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1991 | 19.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1992 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.6% |
| 1993 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1994 | 11.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -34.3% |
| 1995 | 11.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1996 | 10.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.9% |
| 1997 | 9.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.8% |
| 1998 | 7.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -15.1% |
| 1999 | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +92.4% |
| 2000 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.9% |
| 2001 | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 2002 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 2003 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 2004 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2005 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 12.05 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 2007 | 12.06 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 12.11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 2009 | 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.1% |
China compared with similar countries
- China's 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 66% of the median. (14 countries reporting)
- China's 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 13.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 90% of the median. (7 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in China changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1962 | +105.6% | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1999 | +92.4% | 7.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
| 1950s | 33.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 24.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 14.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.05 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
Countries ranked near China
- 31 Russia 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 32 Cyprus 12.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 33 Sweden 12.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 35 Mauritius 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 36 Belgium 11.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 37 Cuba 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 18.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 165.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 206.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 350.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1,480 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 102.37 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in China?
- The demographic transition in sweden in China was 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1963.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1998.
- How does China rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- China ranks 34th out of 56 countries with data for 2009.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.