Control of Corruption in Ethiopia
Ethiopia: Control of Corruption was 0.1641 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption in Ethiopia, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
In 2011, control of corruption in Ethiopia stood at 0.1641 standard error.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.3% on the previous year and down 32.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption in Ethiopia peaked at 0.2959 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1525 standard error, in 2006.
That places Ethiopia 35th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Control of Corruption in Ethiopia, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2959 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.1985 standard error | -32.9% |
| 2000 | 0.2425 standard error | +22.2% |
| 2002 | 0.1884 standard error | -22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.1918 standard error | +1.8% |
| 2004 | 0.1797 standard error | -6.3% |
| 2005 | 0.1743 standard error | -3.0% |
| 2006 | 0.1525 standard error | -12.5% |
| 2007 | 0.1576 standard error | +3.4% |
| 2008 | 0.1581 standard error | +0.3% |
| 2009 | 0.1722 standard error | +8.9% |
| 2010 | 0.1697 standard error | -1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.1641 standard error | -3.3% |
Ethiopia compared with similar countries
- Ethiopia's 0.1641 standard error is below the median for low income countries, which is 0.1776 standard error, 92% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Ethiopia's 0.1641 standard error is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1749 standard error, 94% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2472 standard error | 0.1985 standard error | 0.2959 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1797 standard error | 0.1525 standard error | 0.2425 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1669 standard error | 0.1641 standard error | 0.1697 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Ethiopia
More reference data data for Ethiopia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6564 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 20.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 25.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 100.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 121.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 7.47 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption in Ethiopia?
- Control of corruption in Ethiopia was 0.1641 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest control of corruption recorded in Ethiopia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2959 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest control of corruption recorded in Ethiopia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1525 standard error in 2006.
- How does Ethiopia rank for control of corruption?
- Ethiopia ranks 35th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is control of corruption rising or falling in Ethiopia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 32.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ethiopia data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.