Control of Corruption in Angola
Angola: Control of Corruption was 0.1641 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption in Angola, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
The most recent figure for control of corruption in Angola is 0.1641 standard error, measured in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.3% on the previous year and down 32.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption in Angola peaked at 0.2959 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1641 standard error, in 2011.
That places Angola 35th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Control of Corruption in Angola, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2959 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.1985 standard error | -32.9% |
| 2000 | 0.2425 standard error | +22.2% |
| 2002 | 0.1884 standard error | -22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.1918 standard error | +1.8% |
| 2004 | 0.1797 standard error | -6.3% |
| 2005 | 0.1932 standard error | +7.5% |
| 2006 | 0.1742 standard error | -9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.1948 standard error | +11.8% |
| 2008 | 0.194 standard error | -0.4% |
| 2009 | 0.1852 standard error | -4.5% |
| 2010 | 0.1697 standard error | -8.4% |
| 2011 | 0.1641 standard error | -3.3% |
Angola compared with similar countries
- Angola's 0.1641 standard error is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1659 standard error, 99% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Angola's 0.1641 standard error is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1749 standard error, 94% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2472 standard error | 0.1985 standard error | 0.2959 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1938 standard error | 0.1742 standard error | 0.2425 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1669 standard error | 0.1641 standard error | 0.1697 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Angola
More reference data data for Angola
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4536 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.163 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 20.43 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8877 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption in Angola?
- Control of corruption in Angola was 0.1641 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest control of corruption recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2959 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest control of corruption recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1641 standard error in 2011.
- How does Angola rank for control of corruption?
- Angola ranks 35th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is control of corruption rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is down 32.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.